Tetrapolydactyly: a rare presentation and review of the literature

Article information

Arch Hand Microsurg. 2024;29(3):187-190
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 July 25
doi : https://doi.org/10.12790/ahm.24.0025
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
2Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
Corresponding author: Kunihiro Kawashima Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sapporo City General Hospital, 1-1 13 Chome, Kita 11 Jonishi, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8604, Japan Tel: +81-11-726-2211 Fax: +81-11-726-7912 E-mail: kunihiro.kawashima@doc.city.sapporo.jp
Received 2024 May 27; Revised 2024 June 25; Accepted 2024 June 25.

Abstract

Polydactyly is a common congenital anomaly characterized by the presence of extra digits on the hands and/or feet, potentially involving all four limbs simultaneously. The terminology used to describe polydactyly involving all four limbs varies in the literature, with terms such as “tetrapolydactyly,” “polydactyly 24,” and “hexadactyly of all limbs” being used interchangeably. We encountered a case of tetrapolydactyly in a female neonate with postaxial polydactyly involving all four limbs. Our patient had an extra digit on the ulnar side with a bony component on the left hand and a similar extra digit without a bony articulation at the base of the right hand. The right foot showed postaxial polydactyly, and the left foot exhibited both preaxial polysyndactyly and postaxial polydactyly. A review of the literature shows that this combination of anomalies is extremely rare. A family history is present in approximately 30% of cases, asymmetric patterns are rarer than symmetric patterns, and heptadactyly is particularly uncommon. This report summarizes the information on tetrapolydactyly in the literature and discusses the clinical implications as well as management strategies.

Introduction

Polydactyly is a common congenital anomaly characterized by the presence of extra digits on the hands and/or feet. It can occur as an isolated condition or as part of a syndrome. Polydactyly is typically classified as preaxial, postaxial, or central. Postaxial polydactyly is most frequently observed in African and African–American populations, whereas preaxial polydactyly is more common in Asian populations [1,2].

Tetrapolydactyly, which involves all four limbs, is a rare presentation that can manifest as non-articulated nubbins of soft tissue or fully articulated extra digits involving bone. The condition may occur sporadically or show a familial pattern, often with autosomal dominant inheritance [1-3].

This report describes a rare case of tetrapolydactyly in a female neonate. This case provides valuable insights into the clinical diversity of tetrapolydactyly and underscores the need for ongoing research and documentation.

Case report

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sapporo City General Hospital (R06-064-1132). Written consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this report including all clinical images.

The patient is a female neonate born at 37 weeks and 5 days of gestation via cesarean section with an Apgar score of 9 at birth. Throughout the pregnancy, the mother attended regular prenatal check-ups, and the fetus was consistently observed to be in good health. Upon delivery, the neonate was found to have polysyndactyly in both hands and feet and was promptly referred to our plastic surgery department for evaluation.

All members of the patient’s immediate family (father, mother, and older brother) were phenotypically normal. A comprehensive examination did not reveal any other congenital abnormalities. The patient was discharged in excellent condition 3 days after delivery.

The left hand had an additional digit with a bony component on the ulnar side. This extra digit had a metacarpal bone budding from the middle part of the fifth metacarpal bone and contained two phalanges (Fig. 1). Similarly, the right hand had an additional digit on the ulnar side with a bony component comprising two phalanges but without bony articulation or connection at its base (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Clinical photograph and radiograph of the left hand at 9 months of age. The images show polydactyly on the ulnar side with an additional finger containing two phalanges articulating at the metacarpal head and budding from the fifth metacarpal bone. The abductor digiti minimi was inserted into the additional finger, and it was reconstructed as the base of the fifth proximal phalanx.

Fig. 2.

Clinical photograph and radiograph of the right hand at 9 months of age. The additional finger on ulnar side was the floating type.

The left foot had both preaxial polysyndactyly and postaxial polydactyly (Fig. 3). The preaxial polysyndactyly bifurcated at the first metatarsophalangeal joint, with the skin component conjoined distally at the interphalangeal joint. The postaxial polydactyly bifurcated at the level of the metatarsal bone. The right foot showed postaxial polydactyly, with the additional digit branching off at the level of the metatarsal bone (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3.

Clinical photograph and radiograph of the left foot at 9 months of age. The left foot showed both preaxial and postaxial polydactyly. The preaxial toe and the first toe had an incompletely divided metatarsal bone, with the additional toe articulating with this metatarsal bone. The postaxial toe was articulated to a metatarsal bone, with a Y-shaped configuration.

Fig. 4.

Clinical photograph and radiograph of the right foot at 9 months of age. The right foot showed postaxial polydactyly, demonstrating an asymmetric pattern of polydactyly.

At 7 months of age, the patient was diagnosed with Kawasaki disease and received intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Otherwise, her growth and development has proceeded normally. She underwent surgical intervention for the extra digits at 9 months of age.

The additional digit on the left hand was excised at the metacarpal level, and the abductor digiti minimi was reattached to the base of the fifth proximal phalanx. On the right hand, the floating type digit was removed without complications, ensuring no residual bone or cartilage remained. For the left foot, the preaxial extra digit was disarticulated at the metatarsophalangeal joint, with subsequent joint reconstruction using periosteum. The postaxial extra digit was excised at the origin from the metatarsal bone, followed by reconstruction of the abductor muscle. For the right foot, the postaxial extra digit was removed, and the abductor digiti minimi was reconstructed.

Discussion

The terminology used to describe polydactyly involving all limbs varies in the literature, with terms such as “tetrapolydactyly,” “polydactyly 24,” “crossed polydactyly,” and “hexadactylism of all four limbs” being used interchangeably [4-7]. Tetrapolydactyly refers to the presence of extra digits on all four limbs, polydactyly 24 emphasizes the total number of digits, while hexadactyly indicates six digits per limb. These variations in terminology underscore the importance of clear and consistent definitions for accurate diagnosis and communication in clinical practice. In our case, the left foot had seven toes, making terms such as polydactyly 24 or hexadactyly inappropriate to describe this condition accurately.

A study by Miura et al. [1] published in 1987 investigated the incidence of tetrapolydactyly in 1,529 patients with congenital extremity deformities and identified polydactyly of the hand in 337 cases, polydactyly of the foot in 131, and polydactyly of both hands and feet in 27. If tetrapolydactyly is defined as true involvement of all four limbs, only 14 of their 27 cases had true tetrapolydactyly. Among those 14 cases, only one pair of hands and one pair of feet exhibited asymmetry, indicating that symmetric involvement is the predominant manifestation.

Radulescu et al. [8] investigated 64 cases of polydactyly at their institution and reported that 41 cases involved the hands, 17 involved the feet, and six involved both hands and feet.

We identified several relevant case reports by searching PubMed and Google Scholar using key terms such as “tetrapolydactyly,” “tetrapolysyndactyly,” and “polydactyly 24.” Careful review of the reference lists accompanying these reports led to the identification of 15 case reports. Four of these reports were excluded because no full-text version was available. The remaining cases are summarized in Table 1 [2-5,8-14], utilizing previously established classification systems for each type of polydactyly: the Rayan and Frey system [15] for ulnar polydactyly, the Venn-Watson classification [16,17] for preaxial polydactyly, and the SAM (syndactylism, axis deviation, and metatarsal extension) classification system [18] for postaxial polydactyly. Combined anomalies were found in only one case, which presented with sacrosciatic notch narrowing, which is a minor anomaly. A family history was present in four cases, with no familial tendency in the remaining cases. Interestingly, all the cases with hand involvement showed a postaxial pattern and three showed an asymmetric pattern. Heptadactyly was observed in two cases, including ours. The coexistence of an asymmetric number in the feet and an asymmetric pattern in the hands is unique to our case.

Summary of cases of tetrapolydactyly reported in the literature

During this research, we observed that the morphological features of tetrapolydactyly can be distressing for parents. However, physicians can provide reassurance by explaining that combined anomalies are extremely rare and that hand anomalies can often be managed effectively by surgical intervention. By offering this perspective, physicians can help to alleviate parental anxiety and support a more optimistic outlook regarding their child’s condition.

This case of tetrapolydactyly in a female neonate adds to the limited body of literature on this rare condition. Further research is needed to better understand the genetic basis of tetrapolydactyly and to develop standardized management protocols.

Notes

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Funding

None.

References

1. Miura T, Nakamura R, Imamura T. Polydactyly of the hands and feet. J Hand Surg Am 1987;12:474–6.
2. Atanda OO, Owonikoko KM, Adeyemi AS, Bajowa O. Polydactyly 24 in a female neonate. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2013;2013:798138.
3. Victor E, Victor A. Familial post-axial polydactyly of all limbs in a neonate. Int J Innov Res Med Sci 2023;8:40–3.
4. Sener RN. Case report 636: tetrapolysyndactyly with postaxial type of polydactyly. Skeletal Radiol 1990;19:542–4.
5. Sener RN. Tetrapolydactyly of postaxial type. Pediatr Radiol 1995;25 Suppl 1:S234–5.
6. Hosalkar HS, Shah H, Gujar P, Kulkarni AD. Crossed polydactyly. J Postgrad Med 1999;45:90–2.
7. Villa MC, Rocca A, Kantar A, Lovati C, Porcelli F. Hexadactylism of the four limbs: a case report. Pediatr Med Chir 2006;28:101–5.
8. Radulescu A, David V, Puiu M. Polydactyly of the hand and foot case report. Jurnalul Pediatrului 2006;9:33–34.
9. Mangalgiri AS, Sherke AR. Polydactyly 24: a case report. Int J Anat Var 2009;2:146–9.
10. Wollina U, Verma SB. Sporadic familial ulnar hexadactyly of all four limbs. J Dermatol Case Rep 2010;4:6–10.
11. Mukherjee S, Paul R, Bandyopadhyay M, Das P. Post-axial polydactyly in four limbs with different bony configurations. Int J Anat Var 2011;4:77–9.
12. Banerjee M, Majumdar SK. Hexadactyly in all four limbs in a neonate: a case report. J Dhaka Med Coll 2013;22:219–22.
13. Mohammed D, Haruna GI, Sadisu MM, Sule SA, Musa MA. Isolated tetrapolydactyly in a Nigerian girl. Int J Health Sci Res 2017;7:362–4.
14. Rossi E, Barbieri A, Tamasi S, et al. Hexadactyly: a rare case. Biomed J Sci Tech Res 2017;1:1153–5.
15. Rayan GM, Frey B. Ulnar polydactyly. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1449–57.
16. Belthur MV, Linton JL, Barnes DA. The spectrum of preaxial polydactyly of the foot. J Pediatr Orthop 2011;31:435–47.
17. Masada K, Tsuyuguchi Y, Kawabata H, Ono K. Treatment of preaxial polydactyly of the foot. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;79:251–8.
18. Seok HH, Park JU, Kwon ST. New classification of polydactyly of the foot on the basis of syndactylism, axis deviation, and metatarsal extent of extra digit. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40:232–7.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Clinical photograph and radiograph of the left hand at 9 months of age. The images show polydactyly on the ulnar side with an additional finger containing two phalanges articulating at the metacarpal head and budding from the fifth metacarpal bone. The abductor digiti minimi was inserted into the additional finger, and it was reconstructed as the base of the fifth proximal phalanx.

Fig. 2.

Clinical photograph and radiograph of the right hand at 9 months of age. The additional finger on ulnar side was the floating type.

Fig. 3.

Clinical photograph and radiograph of the left foot at 9 months of age. The left foot showed both preaxial and postaxial polydactyly. The preaxial toe and the first toe had an incompletely divided metatarsal bone, with the additional toe articulating with this metatarsal bone. The postaxial toe was articulated to a metatarsal bone, with a Y-shaped configuration.

Fig. 4.

Clinical photograph and radiograph of the right foot at 9 months of age. The right foot showed postaxial polydactyly, demonstrating an asymmetric pattern of polydactyly.

Table 1.

Summary of cases of tetrapolydactyly reported in the literature

Author Year Country Sex Left hand Right hand Left foot Right foot Family history Other abnormalities
Sener [4] 1990 Turkey Male Type III Type III Postaxial (M2) Postaxial (M2) No Yes
Sener [5] 1995 Turkey Male Type IV Type IV Postaxial (M2) Postaxial (M2) Yes No
Radulescu et al. [8] 2006 Romania Female Type I Type I Preaxial (NA) and postaxial (NA) Preaxial (NA) and postaxial (NA) Yes No
Mangalgiri and Sherke [9] 2009 India Male Type II Type II Postaxial (M1) Postaxial (M1) NA No
Wollina and Verma [10] 2010 Germany Male NA NA Postaxial (NA) Postaxial (NA) Yes No
(Indian case)
Mukherjee et al. [11] 2011 India Female Type II Type II Postaxial (M2) Postaxial (M1) No No
Atanda et al. [2] 2013 Nigeria Female Type I Type I Postaxial (NA) Postaxial (NA) No No
Banerjee and Majumdar [12] 2013 Bangladesh Male Type IV Type IV Postaxial (M2) Postaxial (M2) No No
Mohammed et al. [13] 2017 Italy Female Type III Type IV Postaxial (M2) Postaxial (M2) No No
Rossi et al. [14] 2017 Nigeria Female Type II Type I Postaxial (M2) Postaxial (M1) No No
Victor and Victor [3] 2023 Nigeria Male Type IV Type IV Postaxial (M1) Postaxial (M2) Yes No
Present case 2024 Japan Female Type II Type I Preaxial (type 3) and postaxial (M2) Postaxial (M2) No No

Key details are summarized, including the patient’s sex, type of polydactyly observed in the hands and feet, family history, and any other combined anomalies. All anomalies involving the hands displayed a postaxial pattern. Rayan and Frey’s classification [15] was used for ulnar polydactyly in the hand. A modification of the Venn-Watson classification [16,17] was used for preaxial polydactyly in the foot. The SAM (syndactylism, axis deviation, and metatarsal extension) classification system [18] was used to evaluate the extent of metatarsal involvement in postaxial polydactyly in the foot.

NA, not applicable due to the unavailability of radiographs or lack of description of findings on physical examination.