Clinical and radiologic outcomes of partial trapeziectomy and suture button suspensionplasty for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis: a study with a minimum 2-year follow-up

Article information

Arch Hand Microsurg. 2025;30(1):22-28
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 February 12
doi : https://doi.org/10.12790/ahm.24.0055
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
Corresponding author: In Cheul Choi Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73 Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea Tel: +82-2-920-5924 Fax: +82-2-924-2471 E-mail: indolldr@korea.ac.kr
Received 2024 October 30; Revised 2024 November 8; Accepted 2024 November 14.

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the clinical and radiologic outcomes of partial trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty with a suture button for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis over a 2-year follow-up period.

Methods

This retrospective study involved 17 patients with thumb CMC joint osteoarthritis (Eaton and Littler stage II or III) treated with partial trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty using a suture button. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using a visual analog scale for pain, the Quick DASH score, pinch and grip strength, and thumb range of motion. The trapezial space ratio (TSR) was used as a radiologic parameter to evaluate radiologic outcomes immediately postoperatively, at 6 months, and at the final follow-up.

Results

The study included 17 patients (female, 16 and male, 1) with an average age of 63.2 years (range, 56–70 years). Surgery was performed on the dominant hand in nine cases and the nondominant hand in eight. Significant improvements were observed in clinical outcomes. The TSR significantly decreased up to 6 months postoperatively, but there was no significant change from 6 months onward. Complications included button irritation (n=1), a metacarpal fracture (n=1), and flexor carpi radialis tendon rupture (n=1), which were subsequently treated. At the last follow-up, significant improvements in functional outcomes were observed in comparison to the preoperative status.

Conclusion

The procedure demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes over a 2-year follow-up. This method is less invasive than other surgical techniques because it preserves part of the trapezium, making it a favorable surgical option in patients with early basal thumb arthritis (below Eaton stage III).

Introduction

The thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint has a wide range of motion but is inherently unstable, making it the second most common site of arthritis in the hand after the interphalangeal joints. This condition affects 25% to 40% of postmenopausal women and is the most frequently surgically treated joint in the upper extremity [1].

The progression of thumb CMC joint arthritis is primarily staged based on radiographic findings according to the Eaton and Littler classification [2]. Surgical intervention is considered when symptoms persist despite conservative management. In stage I, anterior ligament reconstruction (LR) or osteotomy may be performed, while in stage II and beyond, various surgical techniques are available. However, long-term outcomes among these techniques reportedly show no significant differences [3,4].

Among the surgical methods, trapeziectomy with LR, using either the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) or abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendons, has shown comparable surgical outcomes [5]. However, LR is technically challenging, as it not only requires sacrificing the FCR and APL tendons but also necessitates Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation. Prolonged K-wire fixation has been criticized for its potential to reduce joint range of motion, increase the risk of infection, and present technical challenges, prompting the development of alternative approaches. One alternative is suture suspensionplasty using the APL and FCR tendons. In this technique, a suture is placed through the insertion of the APL tendon at the base of the first metacarpal and then through the FCR tendon distally, near its insertion on the second metacarpal, before being weaved back through both tendons. This method offers advantages such as shorter surgical time and the elimination of the need for implants or tendon grafts [6].

This method was further refined into trapeziectomy with suture button suspension, introduced by Yao and Song [7] in 2013, which demonstrated excellent outcomes in terms of pain relief and functional recovery, including grip and pinch power, over a 2-year period.

This study aims to analyze the 2-year follow-up results of partial trapeziectomy with suture button suspension based on previously reported short-term outcomes [8], evaluate its effectiveness in the treatment of thumb CMC arthritis, and provide evidence for its future clinical application.

Methods

Ethical Statement: This study received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Korea University Anam Hospital (No. 2023AN0372), and written informed consent was obtained from all the patients. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

1. Study population

It is a retrospective study that included 17 patients with thumb CMC osteoarthritis, classified as Eaton and Littler stage II or III, who underwent suspensionplasty using the TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) system between November 2014 and July 2020. Patients included in the study had persistent symptoms despite conservative treatment and provided informed consent for the surgical procedure. Patients who had not been followed up for more than 2 years and those requiring total trapeziectomy were excluded.

2. Surgical methods

All surgeries were performed under brachial plexus block anesthesia by a single experienced hand surgeon (ICC) at a single academic institution (Korea University Anam Hospital). Under C-arm fluoroscopic guidance, a 2 to 3 cm skin incision was made on the palmar side of the APL tendon at the thumb CMC joint area. The CMC joint capsule was incised, and a 3 to 5 mm portion of the distal trapezium was resected parallel to the articular surface (partial trapeziectomy) (Fig. 1A). Temporary pin fixation was performed from the first metacarpal to the second metacarpal to maintain the appropriate position of the thumb (Fig. 1B). A 4-inch elastic bandage was maintained in the first web space from the insertion of the first guide pin until the suture tension was adequately adjusted to ensure proper thumb positioning (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1.

(A) Skin incision is carried out over the thumb basal joint, and then only the distal “horns” of the trapezial saddle and any peripheral osteophytes are resected. (B) Kirschner wire (K-wire) was introduced through the first and second metacarpal bone as a proper positioning of the thumb. (C) To maintain proper suture tension and ensure appropriate placement of the suture anchor from the initial insertion of the first guide pin until the desired tension is achieved, a 4-inch elastic bandage was maintained in the first glenoid space. (D, E) The 1st generation TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA), which used a 2.7-mm K-wire, could potentially cause fractures in the 2nd metacarpal bone. Therefore, the 2nd generation TightRope (MiniTightRope; Arthrex), with a reduced drill diameter, was developed. (F) Postoperative X-ray, using 2nd generation TightRope.

The authors initially used the first-generation Mini TightRope (Arthrex). However, due to the risk of second metacarpal fractures when using a 2.7-mm drill bit, a modified technique involving the creation of a bone tunnel with a 1.2-mm K-wire was adopted. Subsequently, the second-generation TightRope (Mini TightRope) with a 1.2 tapered K-wire instead of a drill was developed, allowing for safer surgical procedures (Fig. 1D, 1E) [9]. To ensure the proper positioning of the thumb, a 4-inch elastic bandage was maintained in the first web space from the insertion of the first guide pin until the suture was tightened to the appropriate tension. Care was taken to avoid over-tightening, which could cause impingement between the first and second metacarpals. Following the initial suture knot, a ballottement test was conducted to verify the appropriate tension, after which the remaining knots were secured.

3. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation

After surgery, patients were immobilized with a thumb spica splint for 2 weeks, followed by a transition to a brace for 6 weeks. Pinch strengthening exercises were initiated 2 to 3 weeks later. Surgical outcomes were evaluated at the final follow-up visit using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) score, grip strength, and pinch strength compared to the unaffected side, as well as the range of motion in thumb abduction and adduction. The grip and pinch strength measurement devices (Jamar, Cambridge, MA, USA) were employed, and the thumb joint range of motion was measured as the sum of flexion-extension and adduction-abduction angle changes in the coronal and sagittal planes of the first and second metacarpals, expressed as a percentage of the total angle of the unaffected side.

Radiological evaluation of the first metacarpal subsidence was performed by measuring the trapezial space ratio (TSR) on anteroposterior radiographs taken preoperatively, at 6 months postoperatively, and at the final follow-up visit. The TSR was calculated by dividing the height of the trapezial space (distance from the distal pole of the scaphoid to the base of the first metacarpal) by the length of the proximal phalanx of the thumb [9].

Clinical outcomes over a 2-year follow-up period were analyzed by assessing changes in pain, grip strength, pinch strength, and Quick DASH scores from preoperative to final follow-up using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Correlation analysis of the TSR was conducted by comparing plain radiograms at 6 months after surgery and final follow-up measurements at 2 years. A paired t-test was done for statistical analysis between the functional scores of patients before surgery and at the last follow-up. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value of <0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 17 patients included in the study, 16 were female and one was male. The surgery was performed on the dominant hand in nine cases and on the nondominant hand in eight cases. The mean age of the patients was 63.2 years (range, 56–70 years), and the average duration of conservative treatment before surgery was 12.4±7.0 months. According to the Eaton and Littler classification, six patients were classified as stage II, and 11 patients were classified as stage III.

The types of suture buttons used included nine cases with the first-generation Mini TightRope, three cases with the second-generation Mini TightRope, and five cases in which an 8-shaped suture button was created by cutting a 4-hole mini plate in half.

At the 2-year follow-up, significant improvements were observed in clinical outcomes: pain scores decreased from 7.1±1.4 to 3.7±1.2 (p<0.001), Quick DASH scores improved from 50.2±14.3 to 28.3±6.6 (p<0.001), grip strength increased from 62.6%±19.4% to 86.1%±19.4% (p<0.001), pinch strength increased from 69.6%±21.8% to 82.7%±14.5% (p=0.015), and thumb joint range of motion improved from 85.3±9.8% to 98.3±2.65% (p=0.013), all showing statistically significant changes (Table 1).

Clinical outcomes over 2 years after partial trapeziectomy and suture button suspensionplasty

Radiological evaluation of the TSR showed a significant decrease at 6 months postoperatively, with preoperative values averaging 0.45±0.06 and 6-month postoperative values at 0.37±0.07 (p<0.01). However, the TSR showed no significant change from 6-month postoperative to final follow-up values at 0.37±0.06 (p=0.722) (Table 2).

Trapezial space ratio after partial trapeziectomy and suture button suspensionplasty preoperatively, at 6 months, and at the final follow-up

Postoperative complications included one case of second metacarpal tunnel fracture at 6 weeks after surgery, which was treated with cast immobilization for 4 weeks. After cast immobilization, fracture union was observed, and functional outcomes showed significant improvement from preoperative to postoperative assessments. A case with hardware irritation at the second metacarpal button fixation necessitated removal 1 year postoperatively. This patient also showed clinical improvement at the last follow-up. Another case with FCR tendon rupture was treated conservatively. Clinical outcomes were satisfactory.

1. Case example

The patient is a 60-year-old female patient who presented with progressive pain, swelling, and crepitus to the base of the left thumb of her nondominant hand; with significant functional deficit due to pain for the past 12 months. On physical examination, she showed positive shear and grind tests along with tenderness to palpation directly over the thumb CMC joint. Initial plain radiogram of the patient showed narrowing of the CMC joint with sclerotic change, along with small osteophytes, indicating Eaton stage II arthritis (Fig. 2A). Preoperative functional scores showed VAS 6, Quick DASH 45, pinch strength 77.8% (as compared to contralateral), grip strength 81.3% (as compared to contralateral), and thumb range of motion of 90%. Preoperative TSR was 0.38.

Fig. 2.

(A) Preoperative X-ray of the patient’s left hand, showing Eaton stage II carpometacarpal arthritis. (B) Postoperative X-ray at 6 months, showing a decrease in trapezial space ratio (TSR) from preoperative X-ray. (C) Postoperative X-ray at 24 months, showing no progressive decrease in TSR from X-ray taken at 6 months.

As indicated, the patient underwent partial trapeziectomy and suture button suspensionplasty. At the last follow-up at postoperative 24 months, the patient’s pain and functional scores improved significantly (VAS, 1; Quick DASH, 27.5; pinch strength, 91.2%; grip strength, 88.9%; thumb range of motion, 95%) (Fig. 3). At 6-month (Fig. 2B) and at 24-month follow-up (Fig. 2C), the patient’s TSR was 0.36 and 0.37. There were no significant differences in the TSR values at the three indicated time points of follow-up.

Fig. 3.

Clinical photographs showing the thumb's range of motion. The images demonstrate full thumb motion comparable to the contralateral side at the final follow-up.

The patient eventually returned to normal daily activities of living with minimal pain and great functional outcomes.

Discussion

Thumb basal joint arthritis is one of the most common degenerative joint conditions in the hand, with a wide range of pain and disability severity. The prevalence of thumb basal joint arthritis is higher in women than in men [9], consistent with the predominance of female patients in our study. There are various treatment options for thumb basal joint arthritis. Giesen et al. [10] reported satisfactory outcomes in terms of Kapandji scores, pinch strength, and pain relief after surgical nerve ablation in early-stage arthritis patients, but not in those with Eaton and Littler classification grade IV disease. Arthrodesis is a widely used surgical treatment that has been shown to improve DASH scores and pinch strength across multiple studies, although it does not provide statistically superior outcomes compared to anterior LR [3,11,12]. Additionally, partial trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty is another frequently employed surgical technique, offering the benefit of preventing radial displacement of the thumb CMC joint and proximal migration of the first metacarpal, thus enhancing joint stability [13]. Various methods of suspensionplasty have been described, including those using the APL tendon and the TightRope system. The TightRope technique has the advantage of eliminating the need for prolonged K-wire fixation, thereby reducing the risks of restricted joint mobility and infection compared to traditional surgical approaches.

On a technical note, one of the reasons why total trapeziectomy was performed in previous operative techniques such as ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) was because of the surgical room required to perform the surgery. TightRope system allows percutaneous insertion of the rope under C-arm guidance, which does not necessitate a lot of room for ligament passage or interposition in techniques such as LRTI.

Yao and Song [7] reported improved DASH scores with no significant complications in a 2-year follow-up of 21 cases using the TightRope system. At the 5-year follow-up in this study, significant improvements were observed in pain scores, Quick DASH, grip strength, thumb joint range of motion, and pinch strength [14].

Another 10-week follow-up case report demonstrated significant pain reduction, although no significant changes were observed in Quick DASH, pinch strength, grip strength, or range of motion [8].

Downing et al. [15] reported a significant reduction in the TSR at the 1-year follow-up, with similar results across all surgical methods, including simple trapeziectomy, trapeziectomy with palmaris longus tendon interposition, and LR with trapeziectomy. TSR in this study also showed a significant reduction over time at the postoperative 6-month follow-up; however, this reduction was not substantial enough to induce additional arthritis in adjacent joints. Notably, the TSR did not progress from the 6-month postoperative mark to the last follow-up.

We believe that performing a partial trapeziectomy avoids the need to sacrifice unaffected joints and has the advantage of preserving the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint.

Postoperative complications included one case of second metacarpal tunnel fracture 6 weeks after surgery, which was treated with cast immobilization for 4 weeks. This is due to the larger drill diameter used in the first-generation TightRope system. To address this, a second-generation TightRope (Mini TightRope) with a 1.2 tapered K-wire instead of a drill was developed and is currently in use internationally, demonstrating favorable outcomes in clinical studies [9] This second-generation TightRope has been introduced in Korea and was used in the final three cases of this study. A case with hardware irritation at the second metacarpal button fixation necessitated removal 1 year postoperatively. The button is irritated due to its position at the dorsal surface of the 2nd metacarpal. After button removal, the patient showed satisfactory functional outcome as well as radiologic outcome without much subsidence seen on TSR at the last follow-up. We assume that the role of the TightRope button diminishes after about a year with fibrotic adhesion of the rope within the osseous tunnel. Another complication encountered was a rupture of the FCR tendon, which was managed conservatively and demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes at the final follow-up, as an injured FCR is known to result in minimal functional deficit. The rupture was attributed to excessive saw depth during the partial trapeziectomy. To minimize this risk, we limited the use of the saw to only a portion of the procedure and used an osteotome at the deep portion of trapezium to prevent FCR rupture.

The limitations of this study include the small sample size and the variation in surgical instruments used, despite the consistent application of the TightRope technique. Future studies should standardize surgical instruments to minimize statistical bias and ensure robust statistical power through continuous data collection and the inclusion of additional cases.

Conclusion

Partial trapeziectomy followed by suture button suspensionplasty for thumb basal joint arthritis showed significant clinical improvement in short-term follow-up [8], and satisfactory clinical outcomes were maintained at the 2-year follow-up. This technique allows for early mobilization, resulting in less restriction of the joint range of motion. Radiologically, the TSR decreased at the last follow-up in comparison to at preoperative but over the 2-year follow-up period, showed no significant progression in subsidence. Compared to other surgical methods, partial trapeziectomy with suture button suspensionplasty offers advantages such as simplicity, and reduced invasiveness for those who present with relatively early CMC arthritis.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Funding

None.

References

1. Van Heest AE, Kallemeier P. Thumb carpal metacarpal arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16:140–51. 10.5435/00124635-200803000-00005. 18316712.
2. Kennedy CD, Manske MC, Huang JI. Classifications in brief: the Eaton-Littler classification of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016;474:2729–33. 10.1007/s11999-016-4864-6. 27146653.
3. Vermeulen GM, Slijper H, Feitz R, Hovius SE, Moojen TM, Selles RW. Surgical management of primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 2011;36:157–69. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.10.028. 21193136.
4. Martou G, Veltri K, Thoma A. Surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:421–32. 10.1097/01.prs.0000131989.86319.b1. 15277809.
5. Gangopadhyay S, McKenna H, Burke FD, Davis TR. Five- to 18-year follow-up for treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective comparison of excision, tendon interposition, and ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. J Hand Surg Am 2012;37:411–7. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.11.027. 22305824.
6. Lee SK, Ma SB, Choy WS. Suture suspensionplasty using abductor pollicis longus and flexor carpi radialis for advanced thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Ann Plast Surg 2020;84:154–62. 10.1097/sap.0000000000002063. 31663936.
7. Yao J, Song Y. Suture-button suspensionplasty for thumb carpometacarpal arthritis: a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am 2013;38:1161–5. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.040. 23647637.
8. Kim D, Park JW, Park JH, Choi IC. Partial trapeziectomy and suture-button suspensionplasty for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Arch Hand Microsurg 2018;23:12–9. 10.12790/ahm.2018.23.1.12.
9. Parry JA, Kakar S. Dual mini TightRope suspensionplasty for thumb basilar joint arthritis: a case series. J Hand Surg Am 2015;40:297–302. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.057. 25542430.
10. Giesen T, Klein HJ, Franchi A, Medina JA, Elliot D. Thumb carpometacarpal joint denervation for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective study of 31 thumbs. Hand Surg Rehabil 2017;36:192–7. 10.1016/j.hansur.2017.01.007. 28465206.
11. van Laarhoven CM, Schrier VJ, van Heijl M, Schuurman AH. Arthrodesis of the carpometacarpal thumb joint for osteoarthritis; long-term results using patient-reported outcome measurements. J Wrist Surg 2019;8:489–96. 10.1055/s-0039-1694062. 31815064.
12. Li J, Li D, Tian G, Zhang W. Comparison of arthrodesis and arthroplasty of Chinese thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14:404. 10.1186/s13018-019-1469-2. 31783888.
13. Rayan GM, Young BT. Ligament reconstruction arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal arthrosis. J Hand Surg Am 1997;22:1067–76. 10.1016/s0363-5023(97)80051-2. 9471079.
14. Yao J, Cheah AE. Mean 5-year follow-up for suture button suspensionplasty in the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2017;42:569. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.011.
15. Downing ND, Davis TR. Trapezial space height after trapeziectomy: mechanism of formation and benefits. J Hand Surg Am 2001;26:862–8. 10.1053/jhsu.2001.27761. 11561239.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

(A) Skin incision is carried out over the thumb basal joint, and then only the distal “horns” of the trapezial saddle and any peripheral osteophytes are resected. (B) Kirschner wire (K-wire) was introduced through the first and second metacarpal bone as a proper positioning of the thumb. (C) To maintain proper suture tension and ensure appropriate placement of the suture anchor from the initial insertion of the first guide pin until the desired tension is achieved, a 4-inch elastic bandage was maintained in the first glenoid space. (D, E) The 1st generation TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA), which used a 2.7-mm K-wire, could potentially cause fractures in the 2nd metacarpal bone. Therefore, the 2nd generation TightRope (MiniTightRope; Arthrex), with a reduced drill diameter, was developed. (F) Postoperative X-ray, using 2nd generation TightRope.

Fig. 2.

(A) Preoperative X-ray of the patient’s left hand, showing Eaton stage II carpometacarpal arthritis. (B) Postoperative X-ray at 6 months, showing a decrease in trapezial space ratio (TSR) from preoperative X-ray. (C) Postoperative X-ray at 24 months, showing no progressive decrease in TSR from X-ray taken at 6 months.

Fig. 3.

Clinical photographs showing the thumb's range of motion. The images demonstrate full thumb motion comparable to the contralateral side at the final follow-up.

Table 1.

Clinical outcomes over 2 years after partial trapeziectomy and suture button suspensionplasty

Variable Before surgery The last follow-up p-value
VAS 7.1±1.4 (5–10) 3.7±1.2 (1–4) <0.001*
Quick DASH 50.2±14.3 (22.5–72.5) 28.3±6.6 (0–42.5) <0.001*
Grip strengtha) 62.6±19.4 (37.5–100) 86.1±19.4 (53.8–100) <0.001*
Pinch strengtha) 69.6±21.8 (41.7–100) 82.7±14.5 (63.6–100) 0.015*
ROMa) 85.3±9.8 (65.0–100) 98.3±2.65 (75.0–100) 0.013*

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation (range).

VAS, visual analog scale; DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; ROM, range of motion.

a)Compared with the healthy contralateral side.

*p<0.05, statistically significant.

Values in parentheses indicate the range.

Table 2.

Trapezial space ratio after partial trapeziectomy and suture button suspensionplasty preoperatively, at 6 months, and at the final follow-up

Timepoint Trapezial space ratio p-value (vs. previous timepoint)
Preoperative 0.45±0.06 -
At 6-month follow-up 0.37±0.07 <0.001*
The final follow-up 0.37±0.06 0.772

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

The trapezial space ratio is calculated by dividing the trapezial space height by the length of the first proximal phalanx.

*p<0.05, statistically significant.