Outcome Study on Operative Treatment of Mallet Finger |
Yong Hoon Kim, Keun Woo Kim, Hak Jin Min, Ui Seoung Yoon, Jun Ho Baek |
추지의 수술적 치료 결과 |
김용훈, 김근우, 민학진, 윤의성, 백준호 |
|
|
Abstract |
Purpose : To evaluate clinical results and patient’s subjective outcome including complication according to the type of injury and the method of operation in the surgical treatment of mallet finger. Materials and Methods : A closed transarticular Kwire fixation was performed in cases with tendon rupture and chip fracture, only in the case with a poor compliance of patient (13 cases). In intraarticular fracture, according to the method of surgery, patients were divided into pullout suture group (Group I; 11 cases), transarticular Kwire fixation group (Group II; 19 cases), extension block K-wire fixation group (Group III; 10 cases). Clinical results were assessed by Kanie’s scale, patient’s subjective outcome and complication. Result : In the group with tendon rupture or chip fracture, satisfactory result achieved only in 7 cases (54%) by Kanie’s scale, and in 7 cases (54%) by patient’s subjective outcome. In intraarticular fracture, satisfactory cases were 8 (72%) in group I, 12 (64%) in group II, 8 (80%) in group Ⅲ. Patient’s subjective outcomes were satisfactory relatively 8 cases (72%), 11 cases (58%), 8 cases (80%) in group I, II, III. Overall complication rates were 43% (23 cases), According to the method of surgery, complication rate was low in group III (20%), than group I (36%), and group II (52%). Conclusion : We think that the operative treatment is not primary treatment of mallet finger because of its poor clinical results and high complication rates. In intraarticular fracture, extension block K-wire fixation has a relatively good clinical result. |
|
|